legal news


Register | Forgot Password

PEOPLE v. LYNCH PART-V

PEOPLE v. LYNCH PART-V
08:19:2010



PEOPLE v




PEOPLE v. LYNCH





















Filed 8/12/10









IN THE SUPREME
COURT OF
CALIFORNIA







THE PEOPLE, )

)

Plaintiff
and Respondent, )

) S026408

v. )

)

FRANKLIN LYNCH, )

) Alameda
County

Defendant
and Appellant. ) Super. Ct.
No. H-10662

__________________________________ )





Story continued from part IV…..





The court
suggested counsel reflect on the matter, and the prosecutor stated that he
wanted to review a transcript of the hearing before deciding whether to make a
challenge. The court also noted Juror R.A.'s comments might be â€




Description Defendant Franklin Lynch was convicted of the first degree murders of Pearl Larson, Adeline Figuerido, and Anna Constantin; the residential burglary of Larson, Figuerido, Constantin, Bessie Herrick, and Ruth Durham; and robbery of Figuerido, Constantin, Herrick, and Durham. (Pen. Code, §§ 187, subd. (a), 189, 211, 459.)[1] The jury also found true the special circumstance allegations of burglary murder and robbery murder as to all three murder victims, the multiple-murder special-circumstance allegation, and allegations that defendant personally inflicted great bodily injury on Herrick and Durham, who were persons 60 years of age or older. (§§ 190.2, subd. (a)(3), (17), former §§ 1203.075, 1203.09, subd. (a), 12022.7.) The jury returned a death verdict, and the trial court entered a judgment of death. This appeal is automatic. (Cal. Const., art. VI, § 11, subd. (a); § 1239, subd. (b).) For the reasons that follow, Court affirm the judgment.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale