legal news


Register | Forgot Password

PEOPLE v. RAMIREZ Part III

PEOPLE v. RAMIREZ Part III
08:11:2006

PEOPLE v. RAMIREZ






Filed 8/7/06




IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA





THE PEOPLE, )


)


Plaintiff and Respondent, )


) S012944


v. )


) Los Angeles County


RICHARD RAMIREZ, ) Super. Ct. No. A771272


)


Defendant and Appellant. )


_______________________________________ )


Story continue from Part II ………



An actual conflict of interest occurred in Holloway v. Arkansas (1978) 435 U.S. 475, 484 (Holloway), in which indigent codefendants were represented by a single appointed attorney who represented that he had received confidential information from each defendant that created a risk of conflicting interests, but no conflict of interest was found in Cuyler v. Sullivan (1980) 446 U.S. 335 (Sullivan), in which three codefendants were represented jointly by retained counsel in separate trials. The high court observed that the trial court was not obligated to investigate whether counsel's representation of multiple defendants created a conflict of interest, in the absence of an objection by the defendant, stating that â€





Description A defendant whose request to substitute counsel is granted cannot complain on appeal that the trial court should have denied that request. The defendant's only contention on appeal in such circumstances can be that he or she was denied effective assistance of counsel.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale