legal news


Register | Forgot Password

PEOPLE v. ROMERO

PEOPLE v. ROMERO
06:13:2006

PEOPLE v. ROMERO



Filed 6/1/06




CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*






IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA



SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT



DIVISION FOUR










THE PEOPLE,


Plaintiff and Respondent,


v.


EMMANUEL ROMERO,


Defendant and Appellant.



B185902


(Los Angeles County


Super. Ct. No. TA076708)



APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Allen J. Webster, Judge. Affirmed.


Lynda A. Romero, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.


Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Robert R. Anderson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Pamela C. Hamanaka, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Victoria B. Wilson and John Yang, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.


________________________________________________________________________


*Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rules 97(b) and 976.1, this opinion is certified for publication with the exception of parts I and II of the Discussion.


Emmanuel Romero was convicted of murder and attempted murder as the driver in a drive-by shooting. He contends the judgment must be reversed because of instructional errors and insufficiency of the evidence to support the criminal street gang allegation imposed pursuant to Penal Code section186.22, subdivision (b)(1).[1] In the published portion of this opinion, we hold that the specific intent element of section 186.22, subdivision (b)(1), requiring a showing of â€





Description Specific intent element of Penal Code Sec. 186.22 (b)(1), which mandates sentence enhancements for any person convicted of a felony committed "for the benefit of, at the direction of, or in association with any criminal street gang, with the specific intent to promote, further, or assist in any criminal conduct by gang members," does not require intent to further criminal conduct beyond presently charged crime. Where defendant was charged with murder and attempted murder, and evidence showed he intended to shoot people, intended to help another man shoot people, and knew another man was a fellow gang member, Sec. 186.22 specific intent requirement was satisfied.
Rating
2/5 based on 1 vote.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale