PEOPLE v. SOLOMON
Filed 7/15/10
IN THE SUPREME
COURT OF CALIFORNIA
THE
PEOPLE, )
)
Plaintiff and
Respondent, )
) S029011
v. )
)
MORRIS
SOLOMON, JR., )
) Sacramento
County
Defendant and Appellant. ) Super.
Ct. No. 84641
__________________________________ )
Story continued from part II…..
Defendant correctly observes that section 1137 authorizes jurors
to consult their notes during deliberations.
(See People v. Bonillas,
supra, 48 Cal.3d at p. 794.) And he
may be correct that section 1137 appears to contemplate the free exchange of
notes among jurors. The statute
provides, â€
| Description | This is an appeal from an order denying the defendants' motion to compel arbitration. Applying the law to the undisputed facts and exercising our independent judgment, we reverse the trial court's ruling. As we explain below, the plaintiff cannot avoid arbitrating its claims against the signatory defendant, because those claims are within the reach of the arbitration clause. And the plaintiff cannot avoid arbitrating its claims against the nonsignatory defendant, because those claims are inextricably bound up with the obligations arising out of the agreement containing the arbitration clause. |
| Rating |
