legal news


Register | Forgot Password

PEOPLE v.HOLLINQUEST

PEOPLE v.HOLLINQUEST
12:11:2011

PEOPLE v







PEOPLE v.HOLLINQUEST






Filed 1/13/11







CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE




THE PEOPLE,
Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
KOREY HOLLINQUEST,
Defendant and Appellant.



A124613
(Super. Ct. No. 05-051554-4)
ORDER MODIFYING OPINION
AND DENYING REHEARING
[NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT]


THE COURT:

It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on December 20, 2010, be modified in the following particular:

1. On page 7, the third sentence, stating “Defendant was still inside, on the phone.” is modified. The sentence will now read:
Buchanan was still inside, on the phone.
There is no change in the judgment.
The petition for rehearing is denied.
Date: January 13, 2011 ________________________
Margulies, Acting P. J.




Trial Court

Contra Costa County Superior Court





Trial Judge

Honorable Teresa Canepa





For Plaintiff and Respondent

Edmund G. Brown, Jr.
Attorney General
Dane R. Gillette, Chief Assistant Attorney General
Gerald A. Engler, Senior Assistant Attorney General
Gregg E. Zywicke, David H. Rose, Deputies Attorney General





For Defendant and Appellant



Stephen B. Bedrick, Esq.











People v. Hollinquest, A124613




Publication courtesy of California pro bono lawyer directory.
Analysis and review provided by Chula Vista Property line attorney.
San Diego Case Information provided by www.fearnotlaw.com




* Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rules 8.1105(b) and 8.1110, this opinion is certified for publication with the exception of parts III. and IV. of the Discussion.




Description A modification decision.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale