legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Polhill v. Los Angeles County

Polhill v. Los Angeles County
06:10:2006

Polhill v. Los Angeles County




Filed 6/1/06 Polhill v. Los Angeles County CA2/4




NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS


California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.


IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA


SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT


DIVISION FOUR









MARK F. POLHILL et al.,


Plaintiffs and Appellants,


v.


THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES


et al.,


Defendants and Respondents.



B181474


(Los Angeles County


Super. Ct. No. BC285800)



APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Victor Person, Judge. Affirmed.


Haney, Buchanan & Patterson, Steven H. Haney and George G. Romain for Plaintiffs and Appellants.


Manning & Marder Kass, Ellrod, Rameriz, Steven D. Blades and David J. Wilson for Defendants and Respondents.


BACKGROUND


Appellants Mark Polhill, Steven Christensen, James Mehl, and Mark Miller commenced this action on November 21, 2002, by filing an eight-count complaint against respondents, County of Los Angeles (County), County of Los Angeles Fire Department (Fire Department or LACOFD), and Fire Chief, P. Michael Freeman. It is alleged that appellants are all employed by the Fire Department; Polhill as a captain, Christensen and Miller as paramedics, and Mehl as an engineer.


The original eight causes of action were denominated as follows: â€





Description A decision regarding â€
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale