legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Porter v. Dorio

Porter v. Dorio
08:28:2006

Porter v. Dorio




Filed 8/24/06 Porter v. Dorio CA2/3






NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS


California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.


IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA





SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT





DIVISION THREE












BETTY JO PORTER, a Minor, etc., et al.,


Plaintiffs and Appellants,


v.


VINCE DORIO,


Defendant and Respondent.



B185417


(Los Angeles County


Super. Ct. No. NC040718)



APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County,


Elizabeth Allen White, Judge. Affirmed.


Stolpman, Krissman, Elber & Silver, Dennis M. Elber and Donna Silver for Plaintiffs and Appellants.


Keesal, Young & Logan, Albert E. Peacock III and Glen R. Piper for Defendant and Respondent.


_________________________


Plaintiffs and appellants Edward Ross (Ross or plaintiff) in his capacity as guardian ad litem for Betty Jo Porter (Betty) and Jeffrey Dean Porter (Jeffrey), minors, and as representative of the estate of Jeffrey Douglas Porter (Porter or decedent), appeals a judgment of nonsuit in favor of defendant and respondent Vince Dorio (Dorio) following opening statement.


This is an unwitnessed â€





Description Plaintiffs and appellants in his capacity as guardian ad litem for minors, and as representative of the estate of Porter or decedent, appeals a judgment of nonsuit in favor of defendant and respondent following opening statement.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale