Quick Loan Funding v. Sykes
Filed 8/23/06 Quick Loan Funding v. Sykes CA4/3
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION THREE
| QUICK LOAN FUNDING, INC., Plaintiff and Respondent, v. LE VONA SYKES, Defendant and Appellant. | G036332 (Super. Ct. No. 05HL04092) O P I N I O N |
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Orange County, Margaret R. Anderson, Judge. Affirmed.
Le Vona Sykes, in pro. per., for Defendant and Appellant.
Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton, Greg S. Labate and Heather M. Clark, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
Le Vona Sykes appeals from the order granting her former employer, Quick Loan Funding, Inc. (Quick Loan), an injunction against her precluding workplace violence. (Code Civ. Proc., § 527.8.)[1] She contends the trial court abused its discretion by denying her a continuance of the hearing. We find no error and affirm the order.
FACTS
On October 6, 2005, Quick Loan filed a petition for an injunction against Sykes prohibiting workplace violence under section 527.8. Heather Patalano was one of Sykes's former supervisors and the Quick Loan employee identified in the petition as the likely target of possible violent acts by Sykes. The petition detailed Sykes's â€
