Riverside Sheriff's Assn. v. County of Riverside
Filed 6/30/06 Riverside Sheriff's Assn. v. County of Riverside CA4/2
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
| RIVERSIDE SHERIFF'S ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, Defendant and Respondent. | E039131 (Super.Ct.No. RIC 425947) OPINION |
APPEAL from the Superior Court of Riverside County. Gloria Trask, Judge. Affirmed.
Law Offices of Dennis J. Hayes and Dennis J. Hayes for Plaintiff and Appellant.
Joe S. Rank, County Counsel, Robert M. Pepper, Principal Deputy County Counsel; Arias Aaen and Christopher D. Lockwood for Defendant and Respondent.
1. Introduction
In 2002 the sheriff's department of the County of Riverside denied a request by a sheriff's employee for compensatory (comp) time off on a specific date. Efforts to solve the dispute under the memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the county and the department were unsuccessful and the dispute was referred to an arbitrator. The arbitrator rendered an advisory award finding that denial of the employee's request violated the MOU and further finding that the county should â€
