legal news


Register | Forgot Password

ROBERT CARPENTER v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF ALAMEDA COUNTY Part II

ROBERT CARPENTER v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF ALAMEDA COUNTY Part II
07:17:2006

ROBERT CARPENTER v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF ALAMEDA COUNTY





Filed 7/11/06





CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION





IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA





FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT





DIVISION FIVE











ROBERT CARPENTER,


Petitioner,


v.


THE SUPERIOR COURT OF ALAMEDA COUNTY,


Respondent;


YAMAHA MOTOR CORPORATION, USA,


Real Party in Interest.







A112761



(Alameda County


Super. Ct. No. VG03-092371)




Story continue from Part I ………




Having considered the material submitted by the parties, we conclude there is no competent evidence of any express discussion of the â€





Description Court order that, without setting forth names of tests, ordered plaintiff to submit to standardized written psychological tests to test emotional and cognitive functioning. Order did not comply with statutory requirement that discovery order granting mental examination describe tests and procedures in detail. Where record did not indicate what psychological tests defendant's expert would use or terms by which expert obtained tests or any limitations on their disclosure, court erred in ruling that providing plaintiff with copy of written test materials would be copyright infringement in every instance.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale