Roberts v. Superior Court
Filed 6/27/06 Roberts v. Superior Court CA5
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
| DAVID R. ROBERTS, Petitioner v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF FRESNO COUNTY, Respondents, THE PEOPLE, Real Party In Interest. |
F048692
(Super. Ct. No. F04903229-3)
O P I N I O N |
THE COURT*
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING; petition for writ of mandate. Wayne Ellison, Judge.
David E. Roberts, in pro. per., for Petitioner.
No appearance for Respondent.
No appearance for Real Party in Interest.
-ooOoo-
Petitioner, an attorney, challenges the superior court's order finding him in contempt for making comments during a court proceeding. He claims he was denied a hearing. He also challenges the contempt on other grounds.
DISCUSSION
Morales v. Superior Court (1966) 239 Cal.App.2d 947, 951-952 (disapproved on other grounds in Boysaw v. Superior Court (2000) 23 Cal.4th 215, 221), held that the trial court must expressly inform an attorney that he is facing â€
