legal news


Register | Forgot Password

SCHATZ v. ALLEN MATKINS LECK GAMBLE& MALLORY LLP

SCHATZ v. ALLEN MATKINS LECK GAMBLE& MALLORY LLP
12:28:2011

Julie’s test order

SCHATZ v. ALLEN MATKINS LECK GAMBLE& MALLORY LLP













Filed 3/11/09





IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA




RICHARD A. SCHATZ, )
)
Plaintiff and Respondent, )
) S150371
v. )
) Ct.App. 4/1 D047347
ALLEN MATKINS LECK GAMBLE )
& MALLORY LLP, )
) San Diego County
Defendant and Appellant. ) Super. Ct. No. GIN045182
__________________________________ )

MODIFICATION OF OPINION
THE COURT:
The opinion herein, filed on January 26, 2009, and appearing at 45 Cal.4th 557, is modified as follows:
The first full paragraph on page 563 of the filed opinion is modified to read:
“In February 2000, without entering into another agreement, Dr. Schatz retained Allen Matkins to represent him in an easement dispute with a different party or parties affecting the rear access road to his Rancho Santa Fe home. Dr. Schatz paid Allen Matkins $179,088.69 in fees and costs incurred in the matter . . . . Allen Matkins proceeded to trial . . . , and in an April 2003 letter to Dr. Schatz, it demanded [an additional] $169,917.42 in outstanding fees and costs so ‘arbitration will not be necessary.’ ”
This modification does not affect the judgment.


Publication Courtesy of San Diego County Legal Resource Directory.
Analysis and review provided by San Diego County Property line attorney.
San Diego Case Information provided by www.fearnotlaw.com




Description A modification decision.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale