Security Network v. Humboldt Bank
Filed 2/24/06 Security Network v. Humboldt Bank CA2/8
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION EIGHT
| SECURITY NETWORK, INC. et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. HUMBOLDT BANK et al., Defendants and Respondents. | B172679 (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC269450)
|
APPEAL from the judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Irving S. Feffer Judge. Affirmed in part, reversed in part.
King, Holmes, Paterno & Berliner, Howard E. King, and Stephen D. Rothschild for Plaintiffs and Appellants.
Carroll, Burdick & McDonough, Richard M. Fannan, and Vicki L. Freimann; Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland, Robert A. Olson, and Marc J. Poster for Defendants and Respondents.
_________________________________
Security Network, Inc., Custom Tooling & Service, Inc., and Arthur Vanmoor appeal from the judgment awarding them compensatory and punitive damages for conversion, but rejecting their claims for breach of contract. We reverse in part, affirm in part, and remand.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Respondent Cardservice International, Inc. (CSI) is in the business of processing MasterCard and VISA credit card transactions for various merchants under â€
