legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Seltzer v. Eugen Burger Management

Seltzer v. Eugen Burger Management
07:01:2006

Seltzer v. Eugen Burger Management



Filed 6/30/06 Seltzer v. Eugen Burger Management CA1/3



NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS



California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.








IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA



FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT



DIVISION THREE










MARGARET A. SELTZER,


Plaintiff and Appellant,


v.


EUGENE BURGER MANAGEMENT CORPORATION et al.,


Defendants and Respondents.



A109653


(Marin County


Super. Ct. No. CV 030970)



Margaret A. Seltzer is an attorney representing herself. She appeals the trial court's order denying her motion to strike respondents' cross-complaint under the SLAPP[1] statute, Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16, and denying her motion to disqualify counsel. We affirm.


BACKGROUND


Seltzer owns a condominium at 330 Donahue Street, Marin City, within a common interest development known as â€





Description A decision regarding motion to strike respondents' cross-complaint under the SLAPP[1] statute, and motion to disqualify counsel.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale