legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Simpson v. Simpson

Simpson v. Simpson
06:14:2006

Simpson v. Simpson







Filed 6/13/06 Simpson v. Simpson CA2/2




NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS





California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.




IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA



SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT



DIVISION TWO










MICHAEL W. SIMPSON,


Plaintiff and Appellant,


v.


CHARLES R. SIMPSON,


Defendant and Respondent.



B181783


(Los Angeles County


Super. Ct. No. NP008898)



APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Joseph E. di Loreto, Judge. Reversed.


Burkley & Brandlin and Walter R. Burkley, Jr., for Plaintiff and Appellant.


Law Offices of David B. Dimitruk and David B. Dimitruk for Defendant and Respondent.


* * * * * *



We are called upon to decide whether a deceased trustor intended certain assets listed in a schedule attached to his revocable living trust to become part of his trust estate where the assets are subject to the ambiguous language that they â€





Description A decision regarding whether a deceased trustor intended certain assets listed in a schedule attached to revocable living trust to become part of trust estate where the assets are subject to the ambiguous language that they â€
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale