Solovieff-Williams v. Rice
Filed 6/22/06 Solovieff-Williams v. Rice CA3
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT
(El Dorado)
----
| CARLISE A. SOLOVIEFF-WILLIAMS, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. ROBERT J. RICE et al., Defendants and Respondents. | C049406 Sup.Ct.No. PC20030302
|
Plaintiff sued defendants, claiming the house they sold her had substantial undisclosed defects, principally due to the shoddy remodeling defendants performed. After a two-day court trial involving a battle of expert and other witnesses, the trial court entered a defense judgment, finding there were no material defects, and in any event there was no evidence defendants knew of any defect and failed to disclose it.
Plaintiff appeals, contending no substantial evidence supports the judgment. This appeal borders on the frivolous because it is based on a presentation of the evidence in the light most favorable to plaintiff. We shall affirm.
STANDARD OF REVIEW
â€
