legal news


Register | Forgot Password

STATE OF FLORIDA vs. PAUL PART - II

STATE OF FLORIDA vs. PAUL PART - II
08:15:2006

STATE OF FLORIDA vs. PAUL






Supreme Court of Florida




____________



No. SC05-656


_____________




STATE OF FLORIDA,


Petitioner,



vs.



STEVE PAUL,


Respondent.



[June 22, 2006]




Story continue from Part I …




The purpose of double jeopardy protections is not to restrict, but to respect, the Legislature's authority to decide when multiple sentences may be imposed. As the majority acknowledges, see majority op. at 5, we have consistently held that â€





Description A decision regarding (1) intentionally touching the victim's genital area or the clothing covering it, contrary to section 800.04(5), Florida Statutes (1999); (2) intentionally touching the victim in a lewd or lascivious manner by kissing the victim's neck, contrary to section 800.04(6), Florida Statutes (1999); (3) intentionally touching the victim in a lewd or lascivious manner by rubbing penis on the victim's stomach area, contrary to section 800.04(6), Florida Statutes (1999); and (4) intentionally exposing genitals in a lewd or lascivious manner in the presence of the victim, contrary to section 800.04(7), Florida Statutes (1999).
Rating
3/5 based on 1 vote.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale