Tamika G. v. Sup. Ct
Filed 4/18/06 Tamika G. v. Sup. Ct. CA2/1
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION ONE
| TAMIKA G., Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent; LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES, Real Party in Interest. | No. B188921 (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. CK26471) |
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING; petition for extraordinary writ, Daniel Zeke Zeidler, Judge. Petition denied.
Donna Wright Bernstein, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Petitioner.
No appearance for Respondent.
Raymond G. Fortner, Jr., County Counsel, Larry Cory, Assistant County Counsel, and Liana Serobian, Associate County Counsel, for Real Party in Interest.
___________________________________
This is a petition for relief from dependency court orders terminating reunification services for a mother (Tamika G.) and setting a permanent plan hearing for her daughter (D. G.). We deny the petition.
FACTS
D. was born in January 2005. In April, the Department of Children and Family Services filed a petition alleging that, due to her history of substance abuse, Tamika was unable to care for D., and that D.'s four siblings were former dependent children who were still receiving placement services. D. was placed in foster care, and monitored visits for Tamika were authorized. The court sustained the petition in June, ordered reunification services, and ordered Tamika to participate in a drug program with random testing, parent education classes, and individual counseling.
Tamika entered a residential substance abuse facility, where she completed a 90-day program. She was referred to a â€
