Tanya K. v. Superior Court
Filed 8/15/06 Tanya K. v. Superior Court CA4/3
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION THREE
| TANYA K., Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF ORANGE COUNTY, Respondent; ORANGE COUNTY SOCIAL SERVICES AGENCY et al., Real Parties in Interest. | G037006 (Super. Ct. No. DP011213) O P I N I O N |
Original proceedings; petition for a writ of mandate to challenge an order of the Superior Court of Orange County, Gary Vincent, Temporary Judge. (Pursuant to Cal. Const., art. VI, § 21.) Petition denied.
Alexander W. Wallace for Petitioner.
No appearance for Respondent.
Benjamin P. de Mayo, County Counsel, Dana J. Stits and Aurelio Torre Deputy County Counsel for Real Parties in Interest.
Law Office of Harold LaFlamme and Yana Kennedy for the Minor.
* * *
Less than two months ago, the Third District published its opinion in the juvenile case In re S.C. (2006) 138 Cal.App.4th 396. Given the abundantly clear nature of that precautionary tale, no practicing attorney can claim ignorance of the proper standards for briefs in juvenile cases. Yet we are now faced with a writ petition that breaks more rules than it follows. The petition ignores various rules of court regarding form, fails to follow any coherent structure or method of raising issues, lacks legal argument and citations to pertinent legal authority, includes more than 25 â€
