legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Teasdale v. Cal. Dept. of Food and Agric.

Teasdale v. Cal. Dept. of Food and Agric.
07:21:2006

Teasdale v. Cal. Dept. of Food and Agric.






Filed 7/20/06 Teasdale v. Cal. Dept. of Food and Agric. CA4/3







NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS



California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.




IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA



FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT



DIVISION THREE










CARRIE TEASDALE,


Plaintiff and Appellant,


v.


CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE,


Defendant and Respondent.



G035635


(Super. Ct. No. 02CC13289)


O P I N I O N



Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Orange County, Sheila Fell, Judge. Affirmed.


Callari & Summers, Andrew C. Callari; Paoli & Paoli, and Sylvia L. Paoli for Plaintiff and Appellant.


Bill Lockyer, Attorney General of the State of California, Tom Greene, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Mary E. Hackenbracht, Senior Assistant Attorney General; Fox & Sohagi, and Gregory J. Newmark for Defendant and Respondent.


Food and Agriculture Code section 6721 provides that except as exempted under statutes not applicable here, â€





Description A decision regarding inverse condemnation claim.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale