Teng v. P. ex rel. Lockyer
Filed 6/6/06 Teng v. P. ex rel. Lockyer CA4/3
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION THREE
| CHIH HSIN TENG, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. THE PEOPLE ex rel. BILL LOCKYER, as Attorney General, etc., Defendant and Respondent. | G036197 (Super. Ct. No. 05CC07846) O P I N I O N |
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Orange County, Sheila Fell, Judge. Affirmed.
Chih Hsin Teng, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant.
No appearance for Defendant and Respondent.
* * *
In July 2005, Chih Hsin Teng filed a petition for writ of mandate in superior court against the Attorney General seeking, inter alia, reinstatement of his driver's license and damages he allegedly sustained as a result of the revocation of his driver's license by the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) after Teng made unspecified â€
