Teresa M. v. Superior Court
Filed 3/6/06 Teresa M. v. Superior Court CA2/4
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION FOUR
TERESA M.,
Petitioner,
v.
THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY,
Respondent;
LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES,
Real Party in Interest.
| B187141
(Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. CK54665) (Anthony Trendacosta, Juv. Ct. Commissioner)
|
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING; application for a writ of mandate. Writ denied.
Robert Jacobs for Petitioner.
No appearance for Respondent.
Raymond G. Fortner, County Counsel, Larry Cory, Assistant County Counsel, and Frank J. DaVanzo, Principal Deputy County Counsel, for Real Party in Interest.
INTRODUCTION
Following an 18-month review hearing conducted pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.22,[1] the juvenile court ordered that a hearing be held on March 7, 2006, pursuant to section 366.26, to develop a permanent plan for the dependent minor Violeta M. (born in October 1998). The mother, Teresa H., petitions for a writ of mandate to compel the juvenile court to vacate its orders, contending she was not afforded reasonable reunification services. Review by extraordinary writ is the remedy provided in section 366.26, subdivision (l) and rule 38.1, California Rules of Court. Real party in interest the Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services (â€
