Fear Not Law Articles: Teresi v. Martin

Teresi v

Teresi v. Martin

Filed 1/18/07 Teresi v. Martin CA2/8

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION EIGHT

JOSEPH TERESI,

Plaintiff and Appellant,

JOHN E. MARTIN,

Defendant and Respondent.

B190146

(Los Angeles County

Super. Ct. No. BC 330153)

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court for the County of Los Angeles. Elizabeth A. Grimes, Judge. Affirmed.

Greenberg Glusker Fields Claman & Machtinger, Lee A. Dresie and Matthew N. Falley for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Palmieri, Tyler, Wiener, Wilhelm & Waldron and Don Fisher for Defendant and Respondent.

_____________________________

SUMMARY

The plaintiff filed a lawsuit alleging the defendant breached an agreement to pay plaintiff $3 million with respect to a corporation's promissory note to the plaintiff. The defendant sought summary judgment, contending the plaintiff's release of the corporation and its former officers and directors, of whom defendant was one, from â€

Description	The plaintiff filed a lawsuit alleging the defendant breached an agreement to pay plaintiff $3 million with respect to a corporation's promissory note to the plaintiff. The defendant sought summary judgment, contending the plaintiff's release of the corporation and its former officers and directors, of whom defendant was one, from "any and all" claims expressly released the defendant from the $3 million obligation. The trial court agreed and granted summary judgment for the defendant. Court affirm the judgment.
Rating	0/5 1 2 3 4 5 0/5 based on 0 votes.