THE PEOPLE v. ANDREW VASQUEZ

Filed 7/10/06

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA

THE PEOPLE, )

)

Plaintiff and Respondent, )

) S128854

v. )

) Ct.App. 2/7 B159379

ANDREW VASQUEZ et al., )

) Los Angeles County

Defendants and Appellants. ) Super. Ct. No. BA200494

___________ )

Story continue from Part I ………

The Supreme Court gave the problem of an interested prosecutor further attention in Young v. U. S. ex rel. Vuitton et Fils S. A. (1987) 481 U.S. 787, 790 (Vuitton), holding improper a district court's appointment, to prosecute a criminal contempt for violations of an injunction against trademark infringement, of attorneys who also represented the trademark holder. Special criminal contempt prosecutors, like United States Attorneys, should have an undivided duty to see justice done. (Id. at pp. 803-804.) The interest of the government in â€