legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Wallace v. Southwest Airlines

Wallace v. Southwest Airlines
03:29:2006

Wallace v. Southwest Airlines


Filed 3/27/06 Wallace v. Southwest Airlines CA2/8



NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS










California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.












IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA







SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT






DIVISION EIGHT












BRUCE WALLACE,


Plaintiff and Appellant,


v.


SOUTHWEST AIRLINES CO.,


Defendant and Respondent.



B176999


(Los Angeles County


Super. Ct. No. EC028679)



APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County.


Michael S. Mink, Judge. Affirmed.


Bruce Wallace, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant.


DLA Piper Rudnick Gray Cary, Jane H. Barrett and Angela E. Dotson for Defendant and Respondent.


Following a jury trial and defense verdict, appellant Bruce Wallace appeals from the judgment for his former employer, Southwest Airlines (Southwest).[1] In this lawsuit for wrongful termination, unlike the earlier court trial and appeal, appellant relied solely on a claim of disability discrimination.


PROCEDURAL HISTORY AND STATEMENT OF FACTS


Following the court trial and after his previous appeal, appellant initially sought to pursue causes of action for unlawful termination based on age, race, and disability discrimination. He dismissed the causes of action for age discrimination, with the court noting in its ruling on Southwest's motion for summary adjudication â€





Description A decision regarding wrongful termination.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale