Wirth v. State of California
Filed 7/31/06 Wirth v. State of California CA3
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT
(Sacramento)
----
| DANIEL J. WIRTH et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA et al., Defendants and Respondents. | C050065
(Super. Ct. No. 04CS00440)
|
Plaintiffs Daniel Wirth and the California Correctional Supervisors Organization (collectively CCSO) filed a petition for writ of mandate seeking to compel defendants‑‑the Governor, the State of California and the Department of Personnel Administration (DPA)‑‑to afford salary increases for state correctional supervisors in fiscal year 2003-2004, increases that plaintiffs claimed were mandated by Government Code sections 19849.18 and 19849.22.[1]
Section 19849.18 provides that supervisors of correctional officers shall receive â€
