Fear Not Law Articles: Zamudio v. Lopez

Zamudio v. Lopez

Filed 7/27/07 Zamudio v. Lopez CA1/1

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

IRMA ZAMUDIO,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

SAMUEL A. LOPEZ,

Defendant and Appellant.

A116421

(Alameda County

Super. Ct. No. FG06287658)

Samuel A. Lopez appeals from an antiharassment restraining order. (Code Civ. Proc., 527.6.) The appeal is moot because the order restraining him expired on March 19, 2007. (See, e.g., Environmental Charter High School v. Centinela Valley Union High School Dist. (2004) 122 Cal.App.4th 139, 144 [appeal from grant of temporal relief is moot if relief expires before appeal can be heard].)

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

______________________

Marchiano, P.J.

We concur:

______________________

Stein, J.

______________________

Margulies, J.

Publication Courtesy of California free legal resources.

Analysis and review provided by Spring Valley Property line attorney.

Description	Samuel A. Lopez appeals from an antiharassment restraining order. (Code Civ. Proc., 527.6.) The appeal is moot because the order restraining him expired on March 19, 2007. (See, e.g., Environmental Charter High School v. Centinela Valley Union High School Dist. (2004) 122 Cal.App.4th 139, 144 [appeal from grant of temporal relief is moot if relief expires before appeal can be heard].) Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.
Rating	0/5 1 2 3 4 5 0/5 based on 0 votes.