CA Pub. Decisions

A decision regarding collection practices and unfair business practices.

A decision wherein declared that anticompetitive conduct is best defined in terms of the policy and spirit of antitrust laws; the same cannot be said of a business practice that is 'unfair' or 'deceptive' in the terms of section 17200.

A decision regarding possession of cocaine for sale, possession of marijuana for sale, transportation of cocaine and transportation of marijuana.

Records of organized medical peer review committees are exempt from discovery in a civil action pursuant to Evidence Code section 1157.[1] Section 1157.6 extends the same protection to the quality assurance committees of county-operated mental health facilities. Petitioners, challenge an order of respondent court directing them to produce certain documents generated by the chair of the Quality Assurance Committee for the Jail Mental Health Services Division of the Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health.

A modification decision, "party seeking to deviate from the statutory allocation formula bears the burden of proving the use of the normal formula does not fairly represent the extent of the taxpayer's activity in California".

A decision regarding lewd and lascivious conduct on a child under the age of 14, lewd and lascivious conduct on a child under the age of 14.

A decision regarding lewd and lascivious conduct on a child under the age of 14, lewd and lascivious conduct on a child under the age of 14.

A decision regarding challenge of a judge at any time before commencement of a trial or contested hearing.

A decision regarding challenge of a judge at any time before commencement of a trial or contested hearing.

A decision regarding juvenile court order denying them reunification services and setting a section 366.26 hearing in dependency case.

A decision regarding writ of habeas corpus.

A decision regarding an order committing him to the State Department of Mental Health for treatment in a secured facility for two years, after a jury determined he was a sexually violent predator (SVP) within the meaning of the Sexually Violent Predator Act.

A decision regarding injuries in a cross-median collision on Highway 101 and sought to hold defendant California Department of Transportation liable for their injuries on the ground that the accident location was in a dangerous condition.

A decision wherein People of the State of California and Department of Motor Vehicles filed a civil complaint against respondent Cars 4 Causes seeking monetary damages and injunctive relief. The complaint alleges that respondent sold motor vehicles in violation of Vehicle Code smog certification requirements, and engaged in unfair competition and false advertising.