CA Unpub Decisions

In April 2019, defendant Adan Peña was convicted of car theft. As is sometimes the case, the superior court elected to impose an eight-year prison sentence but stay execution of that sentence and place Peña on probation. Peña later violated the terms of supervision and his probation was revoked.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Burt Pines, Judge (Retired judge of the San Diego Co. Sup. Ct. assigned by the Chief Justice pursuant to art. VI, § 6 of the Cal. Const.). Affirmed.

Appointed counsel for defendant, Jose Luis Gutierrez, Jr., has asked this court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Our review of the record has found errors in the court’s imposition of fines, fees, and assessments that we will direct the trial court to correct; we otherwise affirm.

Appointed counsel for defendant, Jose Luis Gutierrez, Jr., has asked this court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Our review of the record has found errors in the court’s imposition of fines, fees, and assessments that we will direct the trial court to correct; we otherwise affirm.

Appointed counsel for defendant, Jose Luis Gutierrez, Jr., has asked this court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Our review of the record has found errors in the court’s imposition of fines, fees, and assessments that we will direct the trial court to correct; we otherwise affirm.

Appointed counsel for defendant, Jose Luis Gutierrez, Jr., has asked this court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Our review of the record has found errors in the court’s imposition of fines, fees, and assessments that we will direct the trial court to correct; we otherwise affirm.

Appointed counsel for defendant, Jose Luis Gutierrez, Jr., has asked this court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Our review of the record has found errors in the court’s imposition of fines, fees, and assessments that we will direct the trial court to correct; we otherwise affirm.

Appointed counsel for defendant, Jose Luis Gutierrez, Jr., has asked this court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Our review of the record has found errors in the court’s imposition of fines, fees, and assessments that we will direct the trial court to correct; we otherwise affirm.

Appointed counsel for defendant, Jose Luis Gutierrez, Jr., has asked this court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Our review of the record has found errors in the court’s imposition of fines, fees, and assessments that we will direct the trial court to correct; we otherwise affirm.

Appointed counsel for defendant, Jose Luis Gutierrez, Jr., has asked this court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Our review of the record has found errors in the court’s imposition of fines, fees, and assessments that we will direct the trial court to correct; we otherwise affirm.

Appointed counsel for defendant, Jose Luis Gutierrez, Jr., has asked this court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Our review of the record has found errors in the court’s imposition of fines, fees, and assessments that we will direct the trial court to correct; we otherwise affirm.

Appointed counsel for defendant, Jose Luis Gutierrez, Jr., has asked this court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Our review of the record has found errors in the court’s imposition of fines, fees, and assessments that we will direct the trial court to correct; we otherwise affirm.

Appointed counsel for defendant, Jose Luis Gutierrez, Jr., has asked this court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Our review of the record has found errors in the court’s imposition of fines, fees, and assessments that we will direct the trial court to correct; we otherwise affirm.

Appointed counsel for defendant, Jose Luis Gutierrez, Jr., has asked this court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Our review of the record has found errors in the court’s imposition of fines, fees, and assessments that we will direct the trial court to correct; we otherwise affirm.