CA Unpub Decisions

Nicole F. appeals from a judgment terminating parental rights and freeing for adoption her now 11 year old daughter, nine year old son, and
seven year old son.Appellant contends the court should have applied the benefit exception to select a permanent plan other than adoption. Court find the record does not support her contentions and affirm the judgment.

A decision regarding personal injury action.

A modification decision.

Appellant appeals from the juvenile court's jurisdictional/dispositional order regarding her child. Appellant contends one of the three jurisdictional allegations was not supported by substantial evidence. Court affirm.

Plaintiff farmers appeal the denial of their petition for writ of mandate challenging the approval by defendant Modesto of a project and related environmental impact report (EIR) involving the construction of 15.9 miles of high voltage electricity transmission lines from a switching station near Westley to MID's Rosemore substation.

The social worker recommended that services be denied pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 361.5, subdivisions (b)(3) (10) and (11). After re establishing the dependency, the court made denial findings under the latter two subdivisions and ordered that a hearing be held to determine minor's permanent plan pursuant to section 366.26.

A decision regarding an appeal from an order of the dependency court terminating parental rights.

Proceedings for extraordinary relief after reference to a Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26 hearing. Petition denied.
Appellant seeks review of juvenile court orders terminating reunification services regarding his son,and referring the matter to a Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26 hearing.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Judge. Reversed and remanded with directions.
Appeal from the May 12, 2006 judgment declaring his three children, two boys and one girl, free from his custody and control upon the petition of the children's mother, and her husband's counsel, and the children's counsel have filed a stipulation to vacate the judgment, remand the case to the superior court for further proceedings, and for immediate issuance of the remittitur. Court accept the stipulation; and reverse.

The parents appeal the judgment terminating their parental rights under Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26.

A jury convicted of possession of a controlled substance and felony child endangerment. The trial court suspended imposition of sentence and placed appellant on probation for five years with the condition appellant serve 365 days in jail.
Appellant appeals, contending her conviction of child endangerment was based on insufficient evidence. Court affirm the judgment.

Appeals from a judgment after a voluntary reference to a special master. Appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the special master's factual determinations. Court determine appellant's contentions are without merit, and affirm the judgment. However, court deny respondent's separate sanctions motion for appelant's filing a frivolous appeal.

A decision regarding petition for writ of mandate under the California Environmental Quality Act

There are triable issues as to whether Covina's employees were guilty of reckless, oppressive or malicious neglect when they failed to follow Renteria's care plan for maintaining the health of her skin. Accordingly, court conclude that this is proper case for issuance of a peremptory writ.