CA Unpub Decisions
California Unpublished Decisions
A criminal law decision regarding residential robbery, assault with a firearm, false imprisonment by violence, grand theft automobile, residential burglary, receiving stolen property, child abuse, possession of a firearm by a felon, assault with a deadly weapon, and unlawful carrying of a dirk or dagger.
|
Plaintiff appeals pro se from the dismissal of her action following the grant of summary judgment to defendants. That summary judgment defeated plaintiff's claims of legal malpractice arising from defendants' representation of plaintiff in a personal injury action following her involvement in a multi-car traffic accident. Court affirmed the judgment.
|
The mother of minor seeks extraordinary writ relief under Welfare and Institutions Code, section 366.26, subdivision (l). Appellant challenges the juvenile court order terminating her reunification services and setting a section 366.26 hearing. Court have reviewed the petition on its merits and deny it.
|
A jury found defendant guilty of carrying a loaded firearm within a public place, possessing a firearm with an obliterated serial number, resisting, delaying, or obstructing a peace officer, carrying a concealed weapon, and participating in a criminal street gang. Court reject defendant's contentions, and affirm the judgment.
|
Following the denial of appellants motion to suppress evidence, pursuant to a plea agreement, pled no contest to possession of a firearm by an ex-felon. Appellant also admitted he had been previously convicted of two serious and/or violent felonies within the meaning of the three strikes law. The court struck one of the prior convictions pursuant to section 1385, and sentenced appellant to two years, doubled to four under the three strikes law.
On appeal, appellant contends, under various theories, that the trial court erred in denying his section 1538.5 motion to suppress evidence. Court disagree and affirm. |
Petitioner in pro. per. seeks an extraordinary writ to vacate the orders of the juvenile court issued at a contested 12-month review hearing terminating reunification services and setting a Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26 hearing as to her daughter S. Court grant the petition.
|
Defendant appeals, claiming the lawsuit is untimely because plaintiff failed to file it within 30 days after the bankruptcy court issued notice of his discharge. Court affirm. Since this case involves an independent action to enforce a judgment rather than an application to renew the original judgment, both state and federal law permit a tolling of the 10-year statute of limitations on plaintiff's action during the pendency of defendant's bankruptcy.
|
This case is a juvenile dependency action in which mother appeals an order removing her daughter from her custody. Appellant maintains the court committed reversible error in its handling of two Marsden hearings, and during the Sara D. hearing at which the court appointed a guardian ad litem.
|
Actions
Category Stats
Listings: 77268
Regular: 77268
Last listing added: 06:28:2023
Regular: 77268
Last listing added: 06:28:2023