CA Unpub Decisions

Following a bench trial in this case involving a real estate transaction, buyers/plaintiffs appeal from a judgment entered in favor of the seller, defendant. Plaintiffs contend a statutory requirement for the seller to provide a transfer disclosure statement (including disclosure of flooding problems) cannot be waived, and therefore the trial court erred in concluding plaintiffs had waived the right to a transfer disclosure statement. Court shall conclude that, even assuming for the sake of argument that the section 1102 statement cannot be waived, plaintiffs fail to show prejudicial error warranting reversal of the judgment, because they did not meet their burden of proof on the element of damages.

Plaintiffs also complain of the trial court's comment that they have a problem with standing (related to their creation and later dissolution of a limited liability corporation). Court conclude the standing issue is moot.

Accordingly, court affirm the judgment.

A criminal law decision regarding carrying a loaded firearm in public.

A criminal law decision regarding committing a forcible lewd act upon a child under the age of 14.

A criminal law decision regarding termination of parental rights.

Appeal from the findings and orders entered at the jurisdictional and dispositional hearing held pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code sections 360, subdivision (d) and 361, subdivision (c). Appellant asks this court to exercise its discretion to review the record for error.

Plaintiff appeals from a postjudgment order granting a new trial on damages following a jury verdict in favor of plaintiff and against defendants based on their violation of the California Unfair Practices Act (UPA; Bus. & Prof. Code, § 17001, et seq.[1]). Defendants also appeal from the judgment raising several issues.

A criminal law decision regarding second degree murder attempted premeditated and deliberate murder and grand theft auto.

Appellant appeals from the judgment denying its petition seeking a writ of administrative mandamus to compel respondent, to set aside order reinstating real party in interest to employment as a deputy sheriff.

A criminal law decision regarding unlawful sexual intercourse with a minor more than three years younger than accuse, three counts of unlawful oral copulation with a minor and three counts of unlawful penetration of a minor with a foreign object.

A decision regarding specific performance and declaratory relief concerning the purchase of residential real property.

A decision regarding terminating parental rights.

A decision regarding an appeal from a conviction of attempting to deter an executive officer from his or her duty.

Appellant pled no contest to inflicting unjustifiable physical pain on a child and admitted an enhancement allegation that in committing that offense he personally inflicted great bodily injury on a child under the age of five years. Thereafter, appellant moved to withdraw his plea. The court denied the motion and imposed a prison term of nine years, consisting of the four-year upper term on the substantive offense and the five-year midterm on the enhancement. On appeal, appellant's sole contention is that the court erred in denying appellant's motion to withdraw his plea (plea motion). Court affirm.

Appellant challenges the juvenile court's jurisdictional findings and assumption of jurisdiction over her children. Court affirm the judgment.