CA Unpub Decisions
California Unpublished Decisions
Mother appeals from a order terminating parental rights. The mother contends the juvenile court should have applied the sibling relationship exception to parental rights termination with respect to childrens. Court found there was no substantial evidence of a significant sibling bond such that ongoing contact with a child was in best interest. Accordingly, court affirm the order.
|
In a pyramid scheme early participants recover more than they contribute. The additional money must be paid in by those who join later. As new and necessarily larger generations join in, the structure resembles a pyramid. Inevitably, since the number of possible participants is finite, growth of such a scheme has to end. This stops the payouts, causing the great majority of participants at the base levels of the pyramid to lose money.
|
A criminal law decision regarding second degree robbery. Appellant appeals contending the trial court erred in (1) denying his motion to exclude identification evidence, (2) failing to instruct on the lesser included offense of theft, (3) permitting his impeachment with an earlier assault conviction, and (4) denying his motion to sever. Appellant further contends (5) there is insufficient evidence to support one of the robbery convictions, and (6) appellant was improperly sentenced to the upper term based on facts not found true beyond a reasonable doubt by the jury. Court reject each of these contentions and affirm the judgment.
|
Defendant and appellant pleaded guilty to one count of operating a chop shop in violation of Vehicle Code section 10801 and receiving stolen property in violation of Penal Code section 496d (§ 496d). Defendant's sole contention on appeal is that the trial court erred in imposing concurrent sentences on both counts under Penal Code section 654 (§ 654). Court agree with defendant and order that the sentence on the receiving stolen property count be stayed.
|
The juvenile court found true against appellant a minor, one count of disturbing the peace with a gang enhancement. Appellant filed a timely notice of appeal on January 6, 2006. Appellant claims sufficient evidence does not exist to support the court's finding true his purported violation of section 415 and the associated gang enhancement. Court affirm.
|
Actions
Category Stats
Listings: 77268
Regular: 77268
Last listing added: 06:28:2023
Regular: 77268
Last listing added: 06:28:2023