CA Unpub Decisions

A criminal law decision regarding possession for sale of cocaine base and possession of a deadly weapon.

A criminal law decision regarding assaulting wife with a deadly weapon and personal use of a knife and personally inflicted great bodily injury under circumstances involving domestic violence.

A decision regarding a dissolution action, appellant contended that the trial court abused its discretion by denying his request for a continuance of trial, and erred by choosing a 1993 date of separation and date of valuation of the family home. Court affirm the judgment.

A criminal law decision regarding committing lewd acts on a child.

A criminal law decision regarding rape of an intoxicated victim.

A decision regarding suit for damages for breach of the lease, declaratory relief, fraud and unlawful detainer.

A criminal law decision regarding inflicting corporal injury upon a spouse, attempted premeditated murder, kidnapping, making criminal threats (§ 422; count 5) and residential burglary.

A criminal law decision regarding carjacking, in violation of Penal Code section 215, subdivision (a), and attempting to dissuade a witness, in violation of section 136.1, subdivision (c)(1).

A decision regarding terminating the guardianship.

A criminal law decision regarding first degree murder, first degree residential burglary and attempted robbery.

A criminal law decision regarding robbery, assault with a deadly weapon and attempted robbery.

A criminal law decision regarding unlawfully driving or taking a vehicle without the owner's consent with the intent to deprive the owner of title and possession and unlawfully receiving a stolen motor vehicle with the knowledge that it had been stolen, driving without a license, possession of marijuana while driving and drug paraphernalia and not having car insurance.

A criminal law decision regarding felony spousal abuse.

Appeal from an order granting respondent's request for a Code of Civil Procedure section 527.6 (section 527.6) injunction against respondent. Appellant challenges the trial court's decision on the grounds that his actions were proper and therefore could not be enjoined. Alternatively, he contends the injunction is overbroad.