CA Unpub Decisions

A decision regarding defamation, malicious prosecution, abuse of process, intentional interference with prospective economic advantage and intentional and negligent infliction of emotional distress.

A decision regarding unopposed claim of extrinsic fraud/mistake.

A criminal law decision regarding committing a lewd act upon a child under 14 years of age.

A decision wherein no arguable issue exist.

A decision regarding a postjudgment order under Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26, terminating parental rights and freeing a child for adoption.

A decision regarding adjudicating a minor a ward of the court based on a finding that he was a minor in possession of a firearm, in violation of Penal Code section 12101, subdivision (a)(1).

A decision as to committing Appellant to the Department of Mental Health for treatment as a mentally disordered offender. Appellant contends that the trial court violated his constitutional and statutory rights when it denied his request for self-representation and failed to conduct a hearing under People v. Marsden (1970) 2 Cal.3d 118 (Marsden), and accepted his counsel's waiver of a jury trial. Court affirms.

A decision regarding terminating family reunification services, denying Mother's request to modify the disposition order.

A deision regarding selecting adoption as the permanent plan for a minor and terminating parental rights.

A decision regarding terminating parental rights and denying hearings on petitions for modification.

A criminal law decision regarding identity theft and grand theft with three prior prison terms.

A mandamus proceedings to compel the Defendant to trim or remove its trees from an airport clear zone.

The court declared appellant a ward and placed him on probation, with the maximum time of confinement set at four years, four months and 25 days. This appeal followed. We reverse the judgment as to the reckless driving, burglary and receiving stolen property counts and affirm as to the possession count.

Appeal from a judgment entered on his plea of nolo contendere in the allegation of possession of a firearm by an ex-felon and willful discharge of a firearm in a grossly negligent manner. His counsel raises no issues and asks this court for an independent review of the record to determine whether there are any arguable issues.