CA Unpub Decisions

The orders of the juvenile court terminating parental rights are vacated and the matter is remanded to the juvenile court with directions to order compliance with the ICWA notice provisions.

A decision regarding first degree murder in which asks this court to independently review the record.

A decision regarding possession of methamphetamine.

A decision regarding first degree murder, possession of firearm by felon, unlawful possession of ammunition and unlawful possession of a controlled substance.

A modification decision.

A modification decision.

A special verdict awarding $1 million in compensatory damages to Potts for breach of an implied agreement to not terminate employment except for good cause. A violation of his rights under the CFRA and wrongful termination in violation of public policy.

A modification decision.

A decision regarding terminating parental rights.

A decision regarding â€

A decision regarding failing to register as a sex offender within five working days of moving and failing to register as a sex offender within five working days of his birthday.

The order reestablishing the conservatorship reversed. Matter is remanded to the superior court, with directions that it (1) set a new hearing regarding reestablishment of the conservatorship, and (2) ensure compliance with applicable law, including its own local rules.

Plaintiffs and cross-defendants sought access over a portion of Cross-complainants and appellants's property to a vacant parcel that Plaintiffs and cross-defendants purchased. The deed conveying the property to Plaintiffs and cross-defendants included an express easement over Cross-complainants and appellants's parcel. Plaintiffs and cross-defendants contended and the jury found, the express easement was relocated by implication to another part of the property. Cross-complainants and appellants, in turn, contends there cannot be an implied easement where the parties' intentions are set forth in an express easement. The Court concluded the express easement herein does not preclude recognition of an implied easement in an alternative location. Here, the original easement was relocated by the grantor once he determined the original location was not feasible. Therefore, uphold the determination that Plaintiffs and cross-defendants has an implied easement over and across the Cross-complainants and appellants driveway and the dirt area next to the Cross-complainants and appellants home for access to the Plaintiffs and cross-defendants parcel.

A decision regarding terminating parental rights, contention as to insufficient evidence to support the court's finding the minor was adoptable was rejected.