CA Unpub Decisions

A decision wherein a minor had committed aggravated assault by hitting the victim in the head with a bottle.[1] Without declaring her to be a ward of the court, the juvenile court placed the minor on probation for six months pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 725, subdivision (a).

A decision regarding possession for sale of a controlled substance in violation of Health and Safety Code .

A decision regarding an order dismissing complaint for failure to prosecute after he filed a defective pleading and failed to amend within the 15 days granted him to do so.

An order recommitting to Atascadero State Hospital (ASH) as a mentally disordered offender on the ground that committed continuous sexual abuse and commission of lewd and lascivious acts with a child under the age of 14.

A decision regarding terminating her parental rights and freeing her daughter for adoption.

A criminal law decision as to possession of a controlled substance.

The parties in an eminent domain action agreed to a general reference, and the referee prepared a statement of decision awarding compensation to the condemnees for the value of their leasehold interests, based on what the referee found to be the fair market value of these interests.

A decision regarding an order of the juvenile court determining that another man, is the presumed father of the dependent child and that petitioner is not entitled to enjoy presumed father status.

A decision regarding an order denying a petition to compel arbitration .

A decision regarding forcible lewd conduct with a child and failing to register as a sex offender.

A decision as to complaint as a discovery sanction for misuse of the discovery process.

A decision regarding an attorney who sells insurance products as an independent contractor attempts to avoid his agreement to arbitrate disputes.

A decision regarding action for wrongful termination, discrimination and retaliation in violation of the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA).

A decision regarding motion to strike cross-complaint pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16, the anti-SLAPP (strategic lawsuit against public participation) statute.