Marriott Ownership Resorts v. San Joaquin Hills Transp. Corridor Agency
Filed 3/29/06 Marriott Ownership Resorts v. San Joaquin Hills Transp. Corridor
Agency CA4/3
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION THREE
| MARRIOTT OWNERSHIP RESORTS, etc., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. SAN JOAQUIN HILLS TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR AGENCY et al., Defendants and Respondents. | G034747 (Super. Ct. No. 03CC01995) O P I N I O N |
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Orange County, William M. Monroe, Judge. Affirmed.
Cox, Castle & Nicholson, Kenneth B. Bley and Deborah M. Rosenthal for Plaintiff and Appellant.
Nossaman, Guthner, Knox & Elliott, E. George Joseph and Suzanne E. Skov for Defendants and Respondents.
Marriott Ownership Resorts, Inc., dba Marriott Vacation Club International (Marriott), is the developer of a 700‑unit timeshare resort in Newport Coast. At the heart of this case is Marriott's claim that because the individual accommodation units within its resort are physically similar to apartments, and are â€
