P. v. Walker
Filed 3/29/06 P. v. Walker CA5
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
| THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. HAROLD WALKER, Defendant and Appellant. |
F046810
(Super. Ct. No. F04904506-3)
O P I N I O N |
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County. R. L. Putnam, Judge.
Susan K. Keiser, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Robert R. Anderson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Mary Jo Graves, Assistant Attorney General, Daniel B. Bernstein and John A. Bachman, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
Appellant Harold Walker was convicted by jury trial of corporal injury to a cohabitant (Pen. Code, § 273.5, subd. (a))[1] and seven other counts related to an attack he inflicted on his former girlfriend. The trial court sentenced him to three years and eight months in prison. On appeal, he contends (1) the trial court abused its discretion by revoking his in propria persona (pro. per.) status, and (2) the determination that his violation of section 273.5, subdivision (a), a â€
