McKenzie v. Lee
Filed 3/30/06 McKenzie v. Lee CA1/3
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION THREE
| NORMAN A. McKENZIE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. SIEN LEE, Defendant and Appellant. | A106298, A107867 A109086, A109894 (Alameda County Super. Ct. No. 8339045) |
These four appeals arise from an extremely protracted and contentious child custody dispute.[1] Plaintiff Norman McKenzie and defendant Sien Lee, who were never married to each other, are the parents of a minor daughter. This episode of litigation started when McKenzie filed to modify a child support order, and Lee sought to modify child custody to allow her to travel and possibly relocate with their daughter to Singapore. This case has repeatedly come before this court, so we will not here recite a detailed history of the proceedings below. Instead, we will address only the issues raised in each of the four pending appeals.
A106298
In this appeal Lee seeks reversal of two orders denying interim attorney fee awards.[2]
â€
