Kinsman v. Unocal
Filed 7/16/07 Kinsman v. Unocal CA1/3
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION THREE
RAY KINSMAN et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. UNOCAL CORPORATION, Defendant and Appellant. | A093424 A093649 (San Francisco County Super. Ct. No. 308646) ORDER MODIFYING OPINION AND DENYING REHEARING [NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT] |
BY THE COURT:
The court orders the opinion filed herein on June 20, 2007 modified as follows:
On page 10, in the first full paragraph, after the third sentence, insert the following sentence: As we have discussed, he also presented evidence from which a jury could infer Unocal knew or should have known his exposure to asbestos was hazardous.
This modification does not alter the judgment. Appellants petition for rehearing is denied.
Dated: ___________________________________ P.J.
Publication courtesy of California free legal advice.
Analysis and review provided by Carlsbad Property line Lawyers.
