legal news


Register | Forgot Password

A & J Liquor v. State Comp. Ins. Fund

A & J Liquor v. State Comp. Ins. Fund
04:02:2006

A & J Liquor v. State Comp. Ins. Fund




Filed 3/30/06 A & J Liquor v. State Comp. Ins. Fund CA1/2









NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS








California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.













IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA







FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT







DIVISION TWO










A & J LIQUOR CO. et al.,


Plaintiffs and Appellants,


v.


STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND,


Defendant and Respondent.



A103809


(San Francisco County


Super. Ct. No. 975982)



I.


This is an appeal from a final judgment entered in favor of respondent State Compensation Insurance Fund (SCIF) following a seven-month court trial of appellants' class action claims. In a 117-page statement of decision, the trial court determined, inter alia, that appellants had failed to sustain their burden of proving liability, causation and damages. Judgment was accordingly entered in favor of SCIF. The trial court also rejected appellants' attempt to seek the decertification of its class status; a status it successfully sought earlier in the litigation over strenuous objection by SCIF.


On appeal appellants candidly concede that, although they disagree with the trial court's findings and conclusions, they do not challenge them. Instead, appellants ask this court to modify the trial court's judgment to: (1) eliminate â€





Description A decision regarding ripeness doctrine.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale