legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Cynthia S.

In re Cynthia S.
07:25:2007



In re Cynthia S.



Filed 7/20/07 In re Cynthia S. CA4/1



NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS



California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.



COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT



DIVISION ONE



STATE OF CALIFORNIA



In re CYNTHIA S., A Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law.



SAN DIEGO COUNTY HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY,



Plaintiff and Respondent,



v.



PRISCILLA G.,



Defendant and Appellant.



D050543



(Super. Ct. No. NJ13254)



APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Harry M. Elias, Judge. Dismissed.



Priscilla G. appeals findings and orders entered at the initial stage of the permanency planning hearing held pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26, including the denial of her section 388 petition. Citing In re Sade C. (1996) 13 Cal.4th 952, she asks this court to exercise its discretion to review the record for error.



In In re Sade C., the California Supreme Court held review pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 is unavailable in "an indigent parent's appeal from a judgment or order, obtained by the state, adversely affecting [her] custody of a child or [her] status as the child's parent." (In re Sade C., supra, 13 Cal.4th at p. 959.) We therefore deny her requests to review the record for error and to address her Anders issues. (Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738.)



Priscilla G.'s counsel also requests leave for her to file a supplemental brief in propria persona. The request is denied.



DISPOSITION



The appeal is dismissed.





BENKE, Acting P. J.



WE CONCUR:





HALLER, J.





IRION, J.



Publication courtesy of San Diego pro bono legal advice.



Analysis and review provided by Poway Property line attorney.





Description Priscilla G. appeals findings and orders entered at the initial stage of the permanency planning hearing held pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26, including the denial of her section 388 petition. Citing In re Sade C. (1996) 13 Cal.4th 952, she asks this court to exercise its discretion to review the record for error.
Priscilla G.'s counsel also requests leave for her to file a supplemental brief in propria persona. The request is denied. The appeal is dismissed.



Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale