Hild v. Southern California Edison Co.
Filed 7/24/07 Hild v. Southern California Edison Co. CA2/2
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
JOSHUA HILD, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY, Defendant and Appellant. | B185778 (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC294734) ORDER MODIFYING OPINION [No Change in Judgment] |
The COURT:
The opinion filed herein on June 25 2007, is ordered modified as follows:
Page 12, Disposition, insert the following sentence between the two sentences: The trial court is directed to enter judgment in favor of appellant Southern California Edison Company.
The Disposition now reads in its entirety:
The judgment is reversed. The trial court is directed to enter judgment in favor of appellant Southern California Edison Company. Appellant may recover its costs on appeal.
This modification does not effect a change in judgment.
Publication Courtesy of California free legal resources.
Analysis and review provided by Spring Valley Property line Lawyers.
