Fear Not Law Articles: In re Patrick T.

In re Patrick T.

Filed 7/23/07 In re Patrick T. CA4/1

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

In re PATRICK T., A Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law.

SAN DIEGO COUNTY HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

RICHARD M.,

Defendant and Appellant.

D050523

(Super. Ct. No. SJ11263)

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Joe O. Littlejohn, Judge. Dismissed.

Richard M. appeals the findings and orders entered at a hearing on a supplemental petition held pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code sections 387. Citing In re Sade C. (1996) 13 Cal.4th 952, he asks this court to exercise its discretion to review the record for error.

In In re Sade C., the California Supreme Court held review pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 is unavailable in "an indigent parent's appeal from a judgment or order, obtained by the state, adversely affecting his custody of a child or his status as the child's parent." (In re Sade C., supra, 13 Cal.4th at p. 959.) We therefore deny his requests to review the record for error and to address his Anders issues. (Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738.)

Richard M.'s counsel also requests leave for him to file a supplemental brief in propria persona. The request is denied.

DISPOSITION

The appeal is dismissed.

McCONNELL, P. J.

WE CONCUR:

HUFFMAN, J.

HALLER, J.

Publication courtesy of San Diego pro bono legal advice.

Analysis and review provided by Poway Property line Lawyers.

Description	Richard M. appeals the findings and orders entered at a hearing on a supplemental petition held pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code sections 387. Citing In re Sade C. (1996) 13 Cal.4th 952, he asks this court to exercise its discretion to review the record for error. In In re Sade C., the California Supreme Court held review pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 is unavailable in "an indigent parent's appeal from a judgment or order, obtained by the state, adversely affecting his custody of a child or his status as the child's parent." (In re Sade C., supra, 13 Cal.4th at p. 959.) We therefore deny his requests to review the record for error and to address his Anders issues. (Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738.) Richard M.'s counsel also requests leave for him to file a supplemental brief in propria persona. The request is denied.
Rating	0/5 1 2 3 4 5 0/5 based on 0 votes.