legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Haskell

P. v. Haskell
08:11:2007



P. v. Haskell



Filed 8/1/07 P. v. Haskell CA2/1



NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS





California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.



IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA



SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT



DIVISION ONE



THE PEOPLE,



Plaintiff and Respondent,



v.



GARY L. HASKELL,



Defendant and Appellant.



B196950



(Los Angeles County



Super. Ct. No. NA072818)



APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Mark C. Kim, Judge. Affirmed.



William D. Farber, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.



No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.



______________________________________




Gary Haskell appeals from the judgment entered following his pre-preliminary hearing plea of guilty to two counts of identify theft and one count of theft and resulting sentence to the low term for identity theft (a concurrent term was imposed on the second identity theft count and sentence for theft was stayed). The crimes were committed between October 23 and December 10, 2006, when defendant, while working at a restaurant, used a stolen credit card to create false food bills, including a tip for himself.



Defendant appealed and we appointed counsel to represent him. Counsel filed a brief in which no issues were raised. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 441442.) We then notified defendant by letter that within 30 days he could personally submit any contentions or issues that he wished us to consider. To date, no response has been received.



We have examined the entire record and are satisfied that defendants attorney has fully complied with his responsibilities and that no arguable issues exist. (People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, 109110; Peoplev.Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d at p. 441.)



The judgment is affirmed.



NOT TO BE PUBLISHED.



MALLANO, Acting P. J.



We concur:



ROTHSCHILD, J.



JACKSON, J.*



Publication Courtesy of California attorney directory.



Analysis and review provided by Oceanside Property line attorney.







*Judge of the Los Angeles Superior Court assigned by the Chief Justice pursuant to article VI, section 6 of the California Constitution.





Description Gary Haskell appeals from the judgment entered following his pre preliminary hearing plea of guilty to two counts of identify theft and one count of theft and resulting sentence to the low term for identity theft (a concurrent term was imposed on the second identity theft count and sentence for theft was stayed). The crimes were committed between October 23 and December 10, 2006, when defendant, while working at a restaurant, used a stolen credit card to create false food bills, including a tip for himself.
Court have examined the entire record and are satisfied that defendants attorney has fully complied with his responsibilities and that no arguable issues exist. (People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, 109110; Peoplev.Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d at p. 441.) The judgment is affirmed.


Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale