Courdy v. Paycom Billing Services
Filed 4/3/06 Courdy v. Paycom Billing Services CA2/4
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION FOUR
| EDWARD A. COURDY, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. PAYCOM BILLING SERVICES, INC., et al., Defendants and Respondents. | B162421 (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC226809) |
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Victor H. Person, Judge. Affirmed.
Haight, Brown & Bonesteel; Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, Roy G. Weatherup; Berney Law Corporation and Russell L. Berney for Plaintiff and Appellant.
Kirkpatrick & Lockhart, Richard P. Crane, Jr., Dennis M. P. Ehling, Robert E. Feyder; Kirkpatrick & Lockhart Nicholson Graham, Dennis M. P. Ehling; and Robert S. Draper for Defendants and Respondents.
______________________
Following adverse rulings limiting the pleadings, discovery, and evidence of damages in this partnership case, Edward Courdy stipulated to judgment against him to facilitate appellate review. We find no error and affirm the judgment.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL SUMMARY
Plaintiff and appellant Edward Courdy and Epoch Systems, Inc.[1] formed a general partnership called Internet Commerce Solutions (ICS). According to the written agreement, the partners agreed â€
