legal news


Register | Forgot Password

ANDREWS v. WHEELER

ANDREWS v. WHEELER
04:05:2006

ANDREWS v. WHEELER


Filed 3/30/06


CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION







IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA







FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT







DIVISION TWO










PAUL ANDREWS et al.,


Plaintiffs and Appellants,


v.


FOSTER WHEELER LLC,


Defendant and Respondent.



A108911


(S.F. City & County


Super. Ct. No. 424591)



Plaintiffs Paul and Eileen Andrews seek reversal of the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of defendant Foster Wheeler LLC (Foster Wheeler). We affirm the trial court's judgment because plaintiffs have not established a triable issue of fact regarding causation.


BACKGROUND


In September 2003, plaintiffs filed products liability claims in superior court in San Francisco against dozens of manufacturers, suppliers, and contractors for allegedly causing the asbestos-related disease suffered by Paul Andrews (Andrews), then 70 years old, as a result of exposure to asbestos during his years of employment. Among other things, the complaint set forth a history of Andrews's work as a laborer, deck hand, and gunner's mate for over 20 years at multiple naval facilities and on naval vessels, including the USS Brinkley Bass (Brinkley Bass). On October 14, 2004, plaintiffs filed an amendment to their complaint which identified Foster Wheeler as the entity sued under the fictitious name â€





Description A decision regarding "products liability claims against manufacturers, suppliers, and contractors causing the asbestos-related disease".
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale