In re Nathaniel D.
Filed 8/22/07 In re Nathaniel D. CA4/1
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION ONE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In re NATHANIEL D., A Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. | |
SAN DIEGO COUNTY HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. H. D. et al., Defendants and Appellants. | D050867 (Super. Ct. No. EJ1915) |
APPEALS from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Gary M. Bubis, Judge. Dismissed.
H. D. and Allen D. appeal the findings and orders entered at the permanency planning hearing held pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26. Citing In re Sade C. (1996) 13 Cal.4th 952, they ask this court to exercise its discretion to review the record for error.
In In re Sade C., the California Supreme Court held review pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 is unavailable in "an indigent parent's appeal from a judgment or order, obtained by the state, adversely affecting his [or her] custody of a child or his [or her] status as the child's parent." (In re Sade C., supra, 13 Cal.4th at p. 959.) We therefore deny the parents' requests to review the record for error and to address their Anders issues. (Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738.)
Allen D.'s counsel also requests leave for him to file a supplemental brief in propria persona. The request is denied. Should H. D.'s counsel request leave for her to file a supplemental brief in propria persona, that request would also be denied.
DISPOSITION
The appeals are dismissed.
IRION, J.
WE CONCUR:
McINTYRE, Acting P. J.
O'ROURKE, J.
Publication courtesy of San Diego pro bono legal advice.
Analysis and review provided by Poway Property line attorney.
