In re T.G.
Filed 9/7/07 In re T.G. CA4/1
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION ONE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In re T.G., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. | |
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. T.G., Defendant and Appellant. | D049728 (Super. Ct. No. J211503) |
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Francis Devaney, Judge. Affirmed.
T.G., a minor, admitted an allegation of soliciting prostitution, a misdemeanor (Pen. Code, 647, subd. (b)), and after the trial, the juvenile court found that she had committed robbery (Pen. Code, 211). The court adjudged her a ward, placed her with her grandmother under home supervision and stayed a commitment to the Breaking Cycles program. After T.G. filed a notice of appeal, the court found that she had successfully completed probation and terminated jurisdiction. We affirm.
BACKGROUND
On January 28, 2006, T.G. offered to have sex with an undercover police officer for money.
On the night of February 14, 2006, police officers saw T.G. and K.C. physically attacking Cassandra G. in the middle of El Cajon Boulevard. T.G. screamed "give me that shit, bitch," and yanked a purse from Cassandra's hand. T.G. ran away, and K.C. followed her, walking quickly. When the police found T.G., she still had Cassandra's purse in her possession. T.G. was uninjured, K.C. had cuts on her neck and arm, and Cassandra had abrasions and scratch marks on her face. A small knife and an earring were found at the scene of the fight. One of the police officers testified that when he approached Cassandra she was crying, screaming and yelling for help. He asked her what was going on, and she replied, "They stole my purse and beat the shit out of me. They tried to put me in the trunk of the white car."
DISCUSSION
Appointed appellate counsel has filed a brief summarizing the facts and proceedings below. Counsel presents no argument for reversal, but asks this court to review the record for error as mandated by People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436. Pursuant to Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738, counsel lists, as possible but not arguable issues: (1) whether admission of Cassandra's statement violated T.G.'s Sixth Amendment right of confrontation; (2) whether the statement was admissible over T.G.'s hearsay objection; and (3) whether any error in admitting the statement was prejudicial.
We granted T.G. permission to file a brief on her own behalf. She has not responded. A review of the record pursuant to People v. Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436 and Anders v. California, supra, 386 U.S. 738, including the possible issues listed pursuant to Anders v. California, supra, 386 U.S. 738, has disclosed no reasonably arguable appellate issues. T.G. has been competently represented by counsel on this appeal.
DISPOSITION
The judgment is affirmed.
AARON, J.
WE CONCUR:
BENKE, Acting P. J.
NARES, J.
Publication courtesy of San Diego free legal advice.
Analysis and review provided by Santee Property line Lawyers.
